So the short version: The difference between a function call that returns a value and a call that returns a value and then executes a block of code is that a function call returns a value, but a function call and then executes the block of code returns a value.
This is the standard rule of thumb in JavaScript. If it returns a value then you can’t call it again (or in the case of a function, you can’t call it again after it’s been called). So the problem for us in web apps is that a function call that returns a value, returns a value and then executes a block of code that returns a value. That’s called a side-effect.
This is a very common problem I’ve run into in HTML5 apps as well. So a function that returns a value and then executes a block of code is called an event handler. So, for example, you can build an app using jQuery’s $.each() function, and then call the function with $.each() to execute the code block. This is called event-based programming.
So in this case, the function is called when you’re getting back to the site and click “go back” as it would usually do in a “go to site” page. This is usually done with a button called “get” which is usually clickable on the page or a button called “go to site”.
I was a bit surprised to find myself using event-based programming rather than the more common way of having event handlers on the pages. But it seems to be a fairly common practice and a good technique for building apps that are very event-dependent. I think that event-based programming is useful, but I’m not sure if it’s useful for all apps.
I think it makes sense to use event-based programming for a few things, but I don’t think that it is a good solution for all apps. I think that it is often overused for things that can be written with a pure function, like form validation.
Javascript function overloading is pretty common. A common example is when a user can register multiple forms with the same name on the same page. And then have events on these forms that fire to change the page. But that can lead to a number of problems. When you have two forms with the same name, you are adding unnecessary complexity to your code.
Overloading functions works well for this situation. Because it is so common in Javascript, it is also pretty common for apps to be written with a pure function. But it can lead to problems that can be solved via a function. The problem is that when you do a function overloading, you are also adding a lot of code to your page.
This is one of those situations where what you need is a function overloading, not a function overloading. In general, this is a coding style that forces you to do everything in one place.
The most common example of “function overloading” is if you do something with a function, then it’s not worth it to do things. The rest of the time you’re writing your code and all of the time you’re writing it. It would be best not to do it.